Who? Dem Cats Do!
Kansas State, welcome to the muddied middle and the epic battle for 5th place in the Big 12. Only four teams have lost fewer than four games in league play, and they appear to have a leg up on the others for 1st round byes. Everything else is up for debate.
At any rate, hang on to your hats, Cat fans. According to Big 12 Outlook, we're about to go on one hell of a ride, and there just might be the possibility of a four-letter tournament at the end of it if things play out right...

| Seed* | Record* | RPI | Pomeroy | Sagarin | Best Win** | Worst Loss** | Coach | |
| Oklahoma | 1 | 16-0 | 3 | 12 | 5 | Purdue | Arkansas | Jeff Capel |
| Kansas | 2 | 12-4 | 23 | 19 | 22 | Washington | UMass | Bill Self |
| Texas | 3 | 11-5 | 26 | 26 | 24 | UCLA | Arkansas | Rick Barnes |
| Missouri | 4 | 11-5 | 30 | 13 | 20 | USC | Nebraska | Mike Anderson |
| Kansas State | 5 | 10-6 | 74 | 37 | 55 | Missouri | Oregon | Frank Martin |
| Oklahoma State | 6 | 9-7 | 27 | 40 | 41 | Rhode Island | Texas A&M | Travis Ford |
| Baylor | 7 | 9-7 | 38 | 36 | 31 | Arizona State | Texas A&M | Scott Drew |
| Nebraska | 8 | 7-9 | 83 | 64 | 74 | Missouri | UMBC | Doc Sadler |
| Texas A&M | 9 | 6-10 | 35 | 75 | 61 | Baylor | Tulsa | Mark Turgeon |
| Iowa State | 10 | 3-13 | 135 | 120 | 114 | Houston | Hawai'i | Greg McDermott |
| Texas Tech | 11 | 1-15 | 118 | 126 | 115 | New Mexico | Lamar | Pat Knight |
| Colorado | 12 | 1-15 | 215 | 165 | 191 | Iowa State | SMU | Jeff Bzdelik |
Note: As any of these numbers change, I will color-code them to indicate direction of change.
Team names that are colored indicate a change in seed.
(green = upward, red = downward)
*Predicted
**According to Pomeroy rating
Amazing what a win over Texas will do for you, isn't it?
If things hold, and assuming the team continues to improve (and I see no reason to think they won't), we are entering the "easy" part of our schedule. Four of the next five games are at home, and the potential exists to put together a long winning streak if we can get by Texas A&M on Saturday.
Current projections have us winning that game and once again beating Kansas at home. In fact, Pomeroy doesn't have us losing again until Missouri and Oklahoma State, for a 7-2 finish. That would put us at 10-6 for the third straight season, award us the No. 5 seed, and put us squarely on the bubble. We would likely play Colorado in the 1st round in this scenario, and then a win on the second day might be enough to put us in for sure.
Based on this information, I now tentatively project that the Big 12 will get at least five teams in the Dance: Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Texas, and Kansas State. Baylor and Oklahoma State might be duking it out for a potential 6th spot. I know this all sounds premature when we still have a losing record in conference play, but look at how our schedule sets up. We will likely win anywhere from 8-10 of our last 12 games. By NCAA committee standards, that's red smokin' hot, kids.
It might be enough to overcome the crappy non-conference resume. It will certainly result in a big RPI boost; Saturday's win already accounted for a nearly 20-point jump. The Texas win was the missing piece in the scenario, and it was the piece I needed to see before I started to call us a bubble team. Barring an upset, I now think it is a realistic possibility we need to be thinking about.
Meanwhile, Baylor and Oklahoma State are a perfect example of why RPI isn't the only thing the committee looks at. Both have high RPIs, mainly remnants of their non-conference schedule, but the eyeball test clearly tells you that both teams are falling apart right now, as Baylor rides a 3-game losing streak since beating us and Oklahoma State has lost four of their last five. Nonetheless, they maintained their position in the projections. We just jumped them. That's how important the Texas win was.
Oklahoma is now projected to run the table. Frankly, I'm not sure that's as ludicrous as it once seemed. They appear to be running away from the pack. Kansas won't beat them in Norman. I'm not sure Texas is good enough to ever beat them. The last real hurdle is Columbia but OU may be unstoppable by then. We'll see.
The top four and the bottom four stayed roughly the same, with only some minor fluctuations in projected records. The main action, as usual, is in the middle, where the current 4-way tie looks to break in our favor. Note that Kansas State jumps Baylor and Oklahoma State here despite losing to both of them. That's what playing in the North can do for you.
Based on Saturday's results, Pomeroy now projects us to beat Kansas. There were no other changes in the Pomeroy projections.
There were no changes in the Sagarin projections.
Big 12 Outlook went 4-2 on Saturday, and I'll trade my accuracy for a win over Texas any day of the week. As for Nebraska beating Texas Tech, I did mention that was a distinct possibility due to the toss-up nature of that game. Only the fact that it was in Lubbock even put it in question. Besides, computers can't account for the genetic insanity of the Knight family.
As you can see below, I like all the home teams to hold serve this week, except Colorado. Now, while there are no toss-up games this week, I have some caveats:
Obviously, R serves only as a tiebreaker, so it is only listed when there is a split between P and S.
Results are plugged into this wonderful tool to generate the predicted records and seed order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 recs | 21 comments
Best Win - Mizzou?
Should be Texas, obviously.
KSU_Philly - February 2, 2009
Surprisingly, the computers love Mizzou more than Texas
Missouri: Pomeroy #13, Sagarin #20
Texas: Pomeroy #26, Sagarin #24
I agree with you, in terms of perception, but in terms of predicted strength, Missouri is considered the better team right now. Now, that could change, especially if the Longhorns beat the Tigers this week.
Should that happen, I will of course update the chart. Frankly, I think our best win is yet to come. That would be the one over the Phlaw on the Kaw. Valentine’s Day Blizzard!
BracketCat - February 2, 2009
Still think Texas is a better win than Missouri?
:)
BracketCat - February 6, 2009
Ooh, funny trifecta I just thought of
Texas beat Oregon in Hawai’i, Oregon beat us at home, we beat Texas in Austin. So who’s the best team?
These are always worthless fun.
BracketCat - February 2, 2009
That's something we leave to the BCS
And I believe Oregon will get the BCS spot, and Texas is going to whine.
Oh wait, wrong sport…..
mystman995 - February 2, 2009
Interesting as always
I fear that, even were we to go on a run to finish 10-6 and fifth place in the conferece, Baylor would still receive the NCAA bid as long as they get their act together. We’ll be screwed over by the fact that we play in the North and our loss to Baylor in Manhattan.
Also, the BU/KU game tonight is going to be very interesting. Baylor is going to be that dangerous, wounded animal that’s backed into a corner. If KU can overcome that and win in Waco, I will be very impressed.
TB - February 2, 2009
Agreed, but...
I really don’t think people (and not you necessarily; Powertards, mostly) are factoring in the Last 12 games stat properly. What that tells the committee is that we have a young team that grew immensely and played its best ball in March. We absolutely did not have that the last two years; both the 06-07 and 07-08 teams melted down a little down the stretch. This team will not, if only because of the schedule. Carry that momentum into the conference tourney and we shall see what we shall see.
BracketCat - February 2, 2009
To continue...
Depending on who beats who, I’m afraid if Baylor has one win less than us in Big 12 play, they would jump over us in the minds of ‘Powertards’ due to the difference in non-con schedules and their big win over us. We have no big non-con wins, Cleveland State are you kidding me?, and that will hurt us if we end up 4th or 5th in the Big 12. 10-6 may not be good enough, even with a 2nd day win in the Big 12 tourney especially if we were to lose big on the 3rd day. 11-5 should be good enough if we play well in the Big 12 tourney, since that would be an 11-1 finish in the Big 12. Even then, the ‘Powertards’ would care more about our weak non-con and our 0-4 start, while forgetting about the 11-1 finish.
In the end I think Texas will be a few wins ahead of Mizzou and our win over Texas will be one of our best since they will likely be in the top 3. It won’t matter though if we don’t finish real strong and beat a few more NCAA teams, while beating all the lesser teams without trouble. That means we’d better run up the score on CU and Tech as much as we can. If we continue to play as we have against Mizzou and Texas, I see us playing in a four letter tourney, but one slip up along the way could be the difference. Go Get ’em Cats!
wabasher - February 2, 2009
I think we have a miscommunication problem
“Powertards” are posters at GoPowercat.com who are incapable of critical thinking, not external critics of the program.
Anyhow, KU’s win tonight was actually great for us. When we beat the Hawks, it will be even more of an RPI boost, and this will drop Baylor to 8-8 in Friday’s projections. Now we need OSU to drop one they shouldn’t as well. (Maybe to us?)
As long as Baylor and OSU finish two games back of us, I don’t think they can pull a Tech ‘06-like jump over us. Teams that fall apart this bad in conference play don’t go to the Dance. And I continue to maintain that the Big 12 is getting at least 5 in. Lunardi has us with a 6th bubble team right now, too.
I just read that almost no mid-major conferences are expected to take up automatic bids. Even if the Big East goes over its usual 7-8 by 1-2 teams, it won’t really matter. The Big 12 is at least the 4th best conference. We’ll be fine as long as we keep winning.
BracketCat - February 3, 2009
In the last paragraph
“automatic” should read “at-large.” Time for bed if I’m making mistakes like that.
BracketCat - February 3, 2009
Respect?
Does anyone monitor this blog: http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix.htm
They track the many different bracketologist predictions throughout the year and, even after impressive back-to-back upsets over Mizzou and Texas, there’s little recognition of K-State at all.
I don’t think we’re in already, but for no one to see the Cats as a tourney team at this point? Harsh.
KSU_Philly - February 2, 2009
A&M and Ok. St. in ahead of us, according to the composite prediction...
KSU_Philly - February 2, 2009
We just don't have...
…the non-conference heft to be in the discussion right now. If we take care of business against Iowa State and Texas Tech in the next two weeks, and steal a road game from Texas A&M and protect Bramlage against the birds, we’ll be in the discussion.
TB - February 2, 2009
A&M obviously the big game of the next three?
Obviously, ISU and Texas Tech should be gimmes. The big one would be beating another projected tourney team on the road in the Aggies.
Should that not happen, I still think the Cats deserve some consideration if they knock off Mizzou on the road or KU at home.
KSU_Philly - February 2, 2009
Yeah...
Except that A&M is not a tourney team. They can’t win on the road.
Baylor has one good road win (us) and OSU has one marginal road win (Nubb). It just depends on how it all plays out, but I think our schedule gives us the upper hand if we seize the opportunity. Things have to play out how I projected for us to even have a chance, though. We MUST got 7-2 from here on out and not lose any ugly games (i.e., to any of the 1-5 teams).
BracketCat - February 2, 2009
This is my favorite series of posts...
I find this to be fascinating.
Panjandrum - February 2, 2009
Thank you, as always
Same to you. Check out TB’s link re: the Big 12 therapy sessions, the silly Squawks and their ignorance of their own school’s cheating ways. It’s hilarious.
BracketCat - February 2, 2009
KSU -12.5 tonight?
That might be a little optimistic, don’t you think? Brackins will be good enough against the Cats’ post game to keep it to single digits – I’m thinking K-State by 7.
KSU_Philly - February 3, 2009
Sutton will be on Brackins
I actually think we’ll blow them out. Usually when a team comes in that has been playing teams tough but still losing, like Texas A&M last year, our pressure is a slap in the face and they just melt down in the OOD.
BracketCat - February 3, 2009
J-Mart's article this morning...
…actually said Sutton won’t be guarding Brackins.
I really hope we’re not going to try and defend Brackins with Darren Kent and Luis Colon.
TB - February 3, 2009
Samuels
He’s nearly Sutton’s equal in some respects, especially in length. As long as he stays out of cheap of fouls…
And Darren is a more able defender than most people give him credit for.
BracketCat - February 3, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bring On The Cats to post a comment.